On 08/02/16 05:51, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:01:34 +0800 > Baole Ni <baolex...@intel.com> escreveu: > >> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value >> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission. >> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the >> corresponding macro, >> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code, >> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro. > > Gah! > > A patch series with 1285 patches with identical subject! > > Please don't ever do something like that. My inbox is not trash! > > Instead, please group the changes per subsystem, and use different > names for each patch. Makes easier for people to review. > > also, you need to send the patches to the subsystem mainatiner, and > not adding a random list of people like this: > > To: gre...@linuxfoundation.org, mauroche...@gmail.com, mche...@infradead.org, > mche...@redhat.com, m.che...@samsung.com, m.szyprow...@samsung.com, > kyungmin.p...@samsung.com, k.kozlow...@samsung.com > > Btw, use *just* the more recent email of the maintainer, instead of > spamming trash to all our emails (even to the ones that we don't use > anymore! > > I'll just send all those things to /dev/null until you fix your > email sending process. > +1285
There are people at Intel who know about things like this. -- ~Randy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
