> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2016 2:05 PM
> To: Kershner, David A <david.kersh...@unisys.com>
> Cc: cor...@lwn.net; t...@linutronix.de; mi...@redhat.com;
> h...@zytor.com; Arfvidson, Erik <erik.arfvid...@unisys.com>; Sell, Timothy
> C <timothy.s...@unisys.com>; hof...@osadl.org; dzic...@redhat.com;
> jes.soren...@redhat.com; Curtin, Alexander Paul
> <alexander.cur...@unisys.com>; janani.rvchn...@gmail.com;
> sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com; pra...@redhat.com; Binder, David Anthony
> <david.bin...@unisys.com>; nhor...@redhat.com;
> dan.j.willi...@intel.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> d...@vger.kernel.org; driverdev-devel@linuxdriverproject.org; *S-Par-
> Maintainer <sparmaintai...@unisys.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drivers: Add visorbus to the drivers/virt directory
> 
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:23:56PM -0400, David Kershner wrote:
> > visorbus is currently located at drivers/staging/visorbus,
> > this patch moves it to drivers/virt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Kershner <david.kersh...@unisys.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Tim Sell <timothy.s...@unisys.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/unisys/Kconfig                                        | 3 
> > +--
> >  drivers/staging/unisys/Makefile                                       | 1 -
> >  drivers/virt/Kconfig                                                  | 2 
> > ++
> >  drivers/virt/Makefile                                                 | 1 +
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/Kconfig                     | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/Makefile                    | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/controlvmchannel.h          | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/controlvmcompletionstatus.h | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/iovmcall_gnuc.h             | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/vbuschannel.h               | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/vbusdeviceinfo.h            | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/vbushelper.h                | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/visorbus_main.c             | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/visorbus_private.h          | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/visorchannel.c              | 0
> >  drivers/{staging/unisys => virt}/visorbus/visorchipset.c              | 0
> 
> I picked one random file here, this last one, and found a number of
> "odd" things in it.
> 
> So, given that I can't really comment on the patch itself, I'm going to
> include the file below, quote it, and then provide some comments, ok?
> > /* visorchipset_main.c
> > ...
> > static void
> > controlvm_init_response(struct controlvm_message *msg,
> >                     struct controlvm_message_header *msg_hdr, int response)
> > {
> >     memset(msg, 0, sizeof(struct controlvm_message));
> >     memcpy(&msg->hdr, msg_hdr, sizeof(struct controlvm_message_header));
> >     msg->hdr.payload_bytes = 0;
> >     msg->hdr.payload_vm_offset = 0;
> >     msg->hdr.payload_max_bytes = 0;
> >     if (response < 0) {
> >             msg->hdr.flags.failed = 1;
> >             msg->hdr.completion_status = (u32)(-response);
> >     }
> > }
> > 
> > static void
> > Billy(struct controlvm_message_header *msg_hdr, int response)
> 
> Not John?  Bob?  Sally?  Alice?  Bernise?  Jean?  Molly?

Huh? What version of source code are you looking at??

The file being moved by this patch should be
drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c in your staging-next branch  
(https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git/tree/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorchipset.c?h=staging-next).
If you look there, you will NOT find "Billy()", but instead 
"controlvm_respond()", i.e.:

static void
controlvm_init_response(struct controlvm_message *msg,
                        struct controlvm_message_header *msg_hdr, int response)
{
        memset(msg, 0, sizeof(struct controlvm_message));
        memcpy(&msg->hdr, msg_hdr, sizeof(struct controlvm_message_header));
        msg->hdr.payload_bytes = 0;
        msg->hdr.payload_vm_offset = 0;
        msg->hdr.payload_max_bytes = 0;
        if (response < 0) {
                msg->hdr.flags.failed = 1;
                msg->hdr.completion_status = (u32)(-response);
        }
}

static void
controlvm_respond(struct controlvm_message_header *msg_hdr, int response)
{
        struct controlvm_message outmsg;

        controlvm_init_response(&outmsg, msg_hdr, response);
        if (outmsg.hdr.flags.test_message == 1)
                return;

        if (!visorchannel_signalinsert(controlvm_channel,
                                       CONTROLVM_QUEUE_REQUEST, &outmsg)) {
                return;
        }
}

One (or both) of us is confused.

Tim Sell

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to