On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:00:06PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > It's pretty harsh because the users of Ion need a less than subtle hint > that something is broken. From experience, warning and leaking memory > just leads to a system that limps along and warnings that get ignored. > At long as Ion is primarily used for Android, I think keeping the > BUG makes sense. If Ion ever gets a large amount of use outside of > Android, moving away from the bug would be appropriate.
Well, if Android users really are *that* ignorant of warning messages, I guess we'll keep the BUG_ON in ion_free. I'll refactor the patch to remove only the BUG_ON in ion_free_nolock as suggested. Best Regards, Johanna Abrahamsson _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
