Modified block comments for style consistency

Signed-off-by: Walt Feasel <waltfea...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
index 5becb37..03fc58e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_cts_flow_control(struct 
channel_t *ch)
        /* Turn off auto Xon flow control */
        efr &= ~UART_17158_EFR_IXON;
 
-       /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+       /*
+        * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
         * out before setting it
         */
        writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -145,7 +146,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_rts_flow_control(struct 
channel_t *ch)
        ier &= ~UART_17158_IER_XOFF;
        efr &= ~UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF;
 
-       /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+       /*
+        * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
         * out before setting it
         */
        writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -185,7 +187,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_ixon_flow_control(struct 
channel_t *ch)
        /* Turn on auto Xon flow control */
        efr |= (UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXON);
 
-       /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+       /*
+        * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
         * out before setting it
         */
        writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -225,7 +228,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_ixoff_flow_control(struct 
channel_t *ch)
        ier |= UART_17158_IER_XOFF;
        efr |= (UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF);
 
-       /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+       /*
+        * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
         * out before setting it
         */
        writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -268,7 +272,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_no_input_flow_control(struct 
channel_t *ch)
        else
                efr &= ~(UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF);
 
-       /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero
+       /*
+        * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero
         * it out before setting it
         */
        writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -308,7 +313,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_no_output_flow_control(struct 
channel_t *ch)
        else
                efr &= ~(UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXON);
 
-       /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+       /*
+        * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
         * out before setting it
         */
        writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -413,7 +419,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_isr(struct dgnc_board *brd, 
uint port)
                        /* Read data from uart -> queue */
                        neo_copy_data_from_uart_to_queue(ch);
 
-                       /* Call our tty layer to enforce queue
+                       /*
+                        * Call our tty layer to enforce queue
                         * flow control if needed.
                         */
                        spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
@@ -438,7 +445,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_isr(struct dgnc_board *brd, 
uint port)
                         * one it was, so we can suspend or resume data flow.
                         */
                        if (cause == UART_17158_XON_DETECT) {
-                               /* Is output stopped right now, if so,
+                               /*
+                                * Is output stopped right now, if so,
                                 * resume it
                                 */
                                if (brd->channels[port]->ch_flags & CH_STOP) {
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to