On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:44:54AM -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote: > I see, indeed, it all makes sense now. > So basically if we unconditionally check for the size to be > 0, we should be > fine then, I imagine. > On the other hand there's probably no se for no param and nonzero param len, > so it's probably even better to enforce size as zero when no param.
Checking for > 0 is not enough, because it could also have an integer overflow on 32 bit systems. We need to cap the upper bound as well. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
