On Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 01:03:41PM +0530, Aditya Shankar wrote:
> Connect to the highest rssi with the required SSID in the shadow
> table if the connection criteria is based only on the SSID.
> For the first matching SSID, an index to the table is saved.
> Later the index is updated if matching SSID has a higher
> RSSI value than the last saved index.
>
> However if decision is made based on BSSID, there is only one match
> in the table and corresponding index is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Shankar <aditya.shan...@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> index c1a24f7..32206b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c
> @@ -665,6 +665,7 @@ static int connect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct net_device
> *dev,
> {
> s32 s32Error = 0;
> u32 i;
> + u32 sel_bssi_idx = last_scanned_cnt + 1;
My understanding from reading the code is that "last_scanned_cnt + 1"
is a randomly chosen invalid value. Just saying:
sel_bssi_idx = last_scanned_cnt;
would also work because it's also invalid and slightly shorter to type.
But I suggest that you go with something like UINT_MAX because that's
more clearly invalid.
> u8 u8security = NO_ENCRYPT;
> enum AUTHTYPE tenuAuth_type = ANY;
>
> @@ -688,18 +689,25 @@ static int connect(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct
> net_device *dev,
> memcmp(last_scanned_shadow[i].ssid,
> sme->ssid,
> sme->ssid_len) == 0) {
> - if (!sme->bssid)
> - break;
> - else
> + if (!sme->bssid) {
> + if (sel_bssi_idx == (last_scanned_cnt + 1))
> + sel_bssi_idx = i;
> + else if (last_scanned_shadow[i].rssi >
> + last_scanned_shadow[sel_bssi_idx].rssi)
> + sel_bssi_idx = i;
Combine these with an ||.
if (!sme->bssid) {
if (sel_bssi_idx == UINT_MAX ||
last_scanned_shadow[i].rssi >
last_scanned_shadow[sel_bssi_idx].rssi)
sel_bssi_idx = i;
In a separate patch, you can reverse the if statement at the start of
the loop:
if (sme->ssid_len != last_scanned_shadow[i].ssid_len ||
memcmp(last_scanned_shadow[i].ssid, sme->ssid,
sme->ssid_len) != 0)
continue;
That way you can pull these lines in a tab.
> + } else {
> if (memcmp(last_scanned_shadow[i].bssid,
> sme->bssid,
> - ETH_ALEN) == 0)
> + ETH_ALEN) == 0){
Add a space before the curly brace.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
