On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> wrote:
> If we happen to receive interrupts during hv_set_host_time() execution
> our adjustments may get inaccurate. Make the whole function atomic.
> Unfortunately, we can's call do_settimeofday64() with interrupts
> disabled as some cross-CPU work is being done but this call happens
> very rarely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hv/hv_util.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_util.c b/drivers/hv/hv_util.c
> index 7e97231..4e50a42 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/hv_util.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_util.c
> @@ -187,6 +187,9 @@ static void hv_set_host_time(struct work_struct *work)
>         struct timespec64 host_ts, our_ts;
>         struct timex txc = {0};
>         int ret;
> +       unsigned long flags;
> +
> +       local_irq_save(flags);
>
>         wrk = container_of(work, struct adj_time_work, work);
>
> @@ -218,6 +221,7 @@ static void hv_set_host_time(struct work_struct *work)
>          * ordered to sync our time by the host.
>          */
>         if (abs(delta) > MAXPHASE || wrk->flags & ICTIMESYNCFLAG_SYNC) {
> +               local_irq_restore(flags);
>                 do_settimeofday64(&host_ts);
>                 return;
>         }
> @@ -232,6 +236,8 @@ static void hv_set_host_time(struct work_struct *work)
>         ret = do_adjtimex(&txc);
>         if (ret)
>                 pr_debug("Failed to adjust system time: %d\n", ret);
> +
> +       local_irq_restore(flags);


This seems like a long time to disable irqs for what your trying to
do. I'd guess you really only want to disable irqs while you aquire
the host and guest timestamps (so they are as close together as
possible).  Since the delta is then calculated, I'm not sure what
disabling irqs for calling adjtimex gets you.

thanks
-john
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to