Wat? I'm sorry but this patch makes no sense at all.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 07:04:41PM -0500, James Simmons wrote: > From: Bruno Faccini <bruno.facc...@intel.com> > > When a LBUG has occurred, without panic_on_lbug being set, > health_check sysfs file must return an unhealthy state. Why? > > Signed-off-by: Bruno Faccini <bruno.facc...@intel.com> > Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7486 > Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/17981 > Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam <bobi...@hotmail.com> > Reviewed-by: Niu Yawei <yawei....@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.o...@yahoo.com> > Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.dro...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimm...@infradead.org> > --- > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c > b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c > index 22e6d1f..ef25db6 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/linux/linux-module.c > @@ -224,8 +224,10 @@ static ssize_t pinger_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct > attribute *attr, > int i; > size_t len = 0; > > - if (libcfs_catastrophe) > - return sprintf(buf, "LBUG\n"); > + if (libcfs_catastrophe) { > + len = sprintf(buf, "LBUG\n"); This line is dead code, now. > + healthy = false; > + } > regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
