On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote: > "ret" isn't necessarily initialized on the success path. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> >
The patch seems correct, but do you have any idea why gcc-7 didn't warn about this? I assume that you found it with smatch, and nobody else did. Arnd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel