On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote:
> "ret" isn't necessarily initialized on the success path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
>

The patch seems correct, but do you have any idea why gcc-7 didn't
warn about this?
I assume that you found it with smatch, and nobody else did.

     Arnd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to