On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:52:49AM +0000, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 21/02/17 20:32, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 03:55:18PM +0000, Ian Abbott wrote:
> >>On 21/02/17 11:18, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> >>
> >>For comedi patches affecting a single driver, we prefer the driver name to
> >>be mentioned in the patch subject, like...
> >>
> >>staging: comedi: cb_pcidas64: blah blah
> >>
> >>>For loop contains only an if conditional (and body of if conditional).
> >>>Conditional can be inverted and the loop continued if the new
> >>>conditional is true without modifying the program logic. This allows
> >>>one level of indentation to be removed.
> >>>
> >>>Invert conditional and continue loop if new conditional evaluates to
> >>>true. Remove one level of indentation from subsequent loop body.
> >>>
> >>>Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <m...@tobin.cc>
> >>>---
> >>>drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcidas64.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> >>>1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>>diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcidas64.c
> >>>b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcidas64.c
> >>>index cb9c269..352f754 100644
> >>>--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcidas64.c
> >>>+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/cb_pcidas64.c
> >>>@@ -1497,16 +1497,16 @@ static int alloc_and_init_dma_members(struct
> >>>comedi_device *dev)
> >>> return -ENOMEM;
> >>> }
> >>> for (i = 0; i < AO_DMA_RING_COUNT; i++) {
> >>>- if (ao_cmd_is_supported(board)) {
> >>>- devpriv->ao_buffer[i] =
> >>>- dma_alloc_coherent(&pcidev->dev,
> >>>- DMA_BUFFER_SIZE,
> >>>- &devpriv->
> >>>- ao_buffer_bus_addr[i],
> >>>- GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>- if (!devpriv->ao_buffer[i])
> >>>- return -ENOMEM;
> >>>- }
> >>>+ if (!ao_cmd_is_supported(board))
> >>>+ continue;
> >>>+ devpriv->ao_buffer[i] =
> >>>+ dma_alloc_coherent(&pcidev->dev,
> >>>+ DMA_BUFFER_SIZE,
> >>>+ &devpriv->
> >>>+ ao_buffer_bus_addr[i],
> >>>+ GFP_KERNEL);
> >>
> >>Since you are unindenting the code, you can reformat those function
> >>parameters at the same time to fix the multiline dereference.
> >
> >Righto, so for comedi/drivers prefer to group multiple checkpatch fixes to
> >one
> >driver in a patch as apposed to grouping by individual checkpatch warning
> >but mixing drivers?
>
> It's more a case of there being no harm in using up the spare space at the
> end of the lines that you have created to reduce the the number of lines.
> The fact that it fixes another checkpatch warning is a bonus!
Cool, thanks. I'll wait until the merge window closes before
re-submitting this.
thanks,
Tobin.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
