On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 04:45:05PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote: > Checkpatch emits various messages. Struct ks_stdio_card contains a > spinlock. It is never used. The data structure contains two fields, > both of which are accessed in ways that don't seem to allow use of a > spinlock. I am not fully qualified however to analyse this. > > Spinlock is either not correctly used or is defined and not needed. > > Fix whitespace errors/warnings/checks. Fix macro definition to clear > checkpatch check and error. > > Kernelnewbie note: I am unsure how to broach issues like this when > discovered. In a patch cover letter like this or some other way? >
None of these applied to my tree at all, perhaps someone else already did these before you? sorry, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
