On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 03:36:34PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 01:37:06PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> > Checkpatch emits CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else
> > statement. Statements in question are single statements so we do not
> > need braces. Checkpatch also warns about multiple line dereference for
> > this code.
> >
> > Fix if/else/else if statement use of braces. Fix function argument layout
> > at the same time since it is the same statement.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <m...@tobin.cc>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> > b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> > index db10e16..68e26f4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/ks_hostif.c
> > @@ -2456,19 +2456,15 @@ void hostif_sme_execute(struct ks_wlan_private
> > *priv, int event)
> > hostif_phy_information_request(priv);
> > break;
> > case SME_MIC_FAILURE_REQUEST:
> > - if (priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 1) {
> > - hostif_mic_failure_request(priv,
> > - priv->wpa.mic_failure.
> > - failure - 1, 0);
> > - } else if (priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 2) {
> > - hostif_mic_failure_request(priv,
> > - priv->wpa.mic_failure.
> > - failure - 1,
> > - priv->wpa.mic_failure.
> > - counter);
> > - } else
> > - DPRINTK(4,
> > - "SME_MIC_FAILURE_REQUEST: failure count=%u
> > error?\n",
> > + if (priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 1)
> > + hostif_mic_failure_request(
> > + priv, priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure - 1, 0);
> > + else if (priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 2)
> > + hostif_mic_failure_request(
> > + priv, priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure - 1,
> > + priv->wpa.mic_failure.counter);
> > + else
> > + DPRINTK(4, "SME_MIC_FAILURE_REQUEST: failure count=%u
> > error?\n",
> > priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure);
>
> No. This isn't nice.
>
> Multi-line indents get curly braces generally for readability. It's
> better to go over the 80 character limit here.
>
>
> if (priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 1) {
> hostif_mic_failure_request(priv,
>
> priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure - 1,
> 0);
> } else if priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure == 2) {
> hostif_mic_failure_request(priv,
>
> priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure - 1,
>
> priv->wpa.mic_failure.counter);
> } else {
> DPRINTK(4, "SME_MIC_FAILURE_REQUEST: failure count=%u
> error?\n",
> priv->wpa.mic_failure.failure);
> }
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
Ok, point noted, thank you.
Tobin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
