On Apr 15, 2017, at 07:50, Rishiraj Manwatkar <manwat...@outlook.com> wrote:
> 
> Comparison should have the CONSTANT on the right side of the test

I don't think this change really improves things.  For standalone comparisons I 
agree
that having the constant on the RHS is best, but here it is like a normal 
mathematical
expression "X <= type < Y" which I think is reasonable to keep even if 
checkpatch.pl
complains a bit.

That said, I don't have strong feelings about this and Greg can apply it or not 
as he
sees fit.  I guess the benefit of applying it is that it stops anyone else from 
sending
the same patch in the future...

Cheers, Andreas

> Signed-off-by: Rishiraj Manwatkar <manwat...@outlook.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2: Added mailing list in cc.
> v2 -> v3: Improved Subject line.
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c 
> b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c
> index 0997254..bec112f 100755
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_io.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
> 
> static inline int cl_io_type_is_valid(enum cl_io_type type)
> {
> -     return CIT_READ <= type && type < CIT_OP_NR;
> +     return type >= CIT_READ && type < CIT_OP_NR;
> }
> 
> static inline int cl_io_is_loopable(const struct cl_io *io)
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ void cl_io_unlock(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_io 
> *io)
>       const struct cl_io_slice *scan;
> 
>       LASSERT(cl_io_is_loopable(io));
> -     LASSERT(CIS_IT_STARTED <= io->ci_state && io->ci_state < CIS_UNLOCKED);
> +     LASSERT(io->ci_state >= CIS_IT_STARTED && io->ci_state < CIS_UNLOCKED);
>       LINVRNT(cl_io_invariant(io));
> 
>       set = &io->ci_lockset;
> -- 
> 2.1.4
> 

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Intel Corporation







_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to