Jork Loeser <[email protected]> writes:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 04:34
>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; KY Srinivasan <[email protected]>; Haiyang
>> Zhang <[email protected]>; Stephen Hemminger
>> <[email protected]>; Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>; Ingo
>> Molnar <[email protected]>; H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>; Steven
>> Rostedt <[email protected]>; Jork Loeser <[email protected]>;
>> Simon Xiao <[email protected]>; Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>; Andy
>> Shevchenko <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [PATCH v5 09/10] x86/hyper-v: support extended CPU ranges for TLB
>> flush hypercalls
>> 
>> Hyper-V hosts may support more than 64 vCPUs, we need to use
>> HVCALL_FLUSH_VIRTUAL_ADDRESS_SPACE_EX/LIST_EX hypercalls in this case.
>
>> +static inline int cpumask_to_vp_set(struct hv_flush_pcpu_ex *flush,
>> +                                const struct cpumask *cpus)
>> +{
>> +    int cpu, vcpu, vcpu_bank, vcpu_offset, cur_bank, nr_bank = 0;
>> +    bool has_cpus;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * We can't be sure that translated vCPU numbers will always be
>> +     * in ascending order, so iterate over all possible banks and
>> +     * check all vCPUs in it instead.
>> +     */
>> +    for (cur_bank = 0; cur_bank < ms_hyperv.max_vp_index/64;
>> cur_bank++) {
>> +            has_cpus = false;
>> +            for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
>> +                    vcpu = hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(cpu);
>> +                    vcpu_bank = vcpu / 64;
>> +                    vcpu_offset = vcpu % 64;
>> +
>> +                    if (vcpu_bank != cur_bank)
>> +                            continue;
>> +                    __set_bit(vcpu_offset, (unsigned long *)
>> +                              &flush->hv_vp_set.bank_contents[nr_bank]);
>> +                    if (!has_cpus) {
>> +                            __set_bit(vcpu_bank, (unsigned long *)
>> +                                      &flush->hv_vp_set.valid_bank_mask);
>> +                            has_cpus = true;
>> +                    }
>> +            }
>> +            if (has_cpus)
>> +                    nr_bank++;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return nr_bank;
>> +}
>
> Note that the HV_VP_SET may contain empty banks. As such, consider
> enabling all (5) bits in the valid_bank_mask, and a single
> for_each(cpu, cpus) pass - setting the bits as per
> hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(cpu).
>

Oh, I didn't know that! I'll switch to doing a single
pass. Unfortunately I have no Hyper-V setup with > 64 vCPUs so I can't
really test if it works or not (I mean empty banks, *_EX hypercalls
work).

-- 
  Vitaly
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to