On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:50:27PM +0000, Craig Inches wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 05:44:59PM +0000, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> > On Jul 12, 2017, at 03:03, Craig Inches <cr...@craiginches.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This fixes a block statement which didnt end with */
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Craig Inches <cr...@craiginches.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > index dd5bc0e46560..a1ae66ede7a8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/include/linux/lnet/socklnd.h
> > > @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ struct ksock_msg {
> > > __u64 ksm_zc_cookies[2]; /* Zero-Copy request/ACK cookie */
> > > union {
> > > struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, it's empty if
> > > - * it's NOOP */
> > > + * it's NOOP
> > > + */
> >
> > Rather than making the multi-line comments even more space consuming (I'm
> > not a big
> > fan of "*/ must be on a line by itself" since it wastes a lot of vertical
> > space),
> > I'd prefer to just shorten the comment, if possible, like:
> >
> > struct ksock_lnet_msg lnetmsg; /* lnet message, empty if NOOP */
>
> That makes sense, I believe the series has already made it to
> staging-next, so not sure what the process would be to fix it up.
staging-next can't be rebased (barring something very drastic). Send a
new patch based on what's been committed.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
