On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:53:25PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > + if (len + 1 > n) {
>
> It's more idiomatic to say "if (len >= n)". Plus that's a good habbit
My reasoning behind using "((len + 1) > n)" is that len represents the length of
the string without null-termination. "buf" is required to store a
null-terminator on top of len. Using "len + 1" shows this requirement
more clearly; I will add brackets around "len + 1" for emphasis.
Thanks for the feedback, I will send a v2.
Regards,
Jacob von Chorus
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
