On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 16:06:32 -0400
Brian Masney <masn...@onstation.org> wrote:

> This patch adds a return_max label for the two cases that need to set
> the lux to TSL2X7X_LUX_CALC_OVER_FLOW and return.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masn...@onstation.org>
Sorry - don't like this last one.  I think it hurts readability.  Leave
this as it was.

Thanks

Jonathan
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c 
> b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> index 42ed9c015aaf..898304d65f64 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2x7x.c
> @@ -364,10 +364,8 @@ static int tsl2x7x_get_lux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>       chip->als_cur_info.als_ch0 = ch0;
>       chip->als_cur_info.als_ch1 = ch1;
>  
> -     if (ch0 >= chip->als_saturation || ch1 >= chip->als_saturation) {
> -             lux = TSL2X7X_LUX_CALC_OVER_FLOW;
> +     if (ch0 >= chip->als_saturation || ch1 >= chip->als_saturation)
>               goto return_max;
> -     }
>  
>       if (!ch0) {
>               /* have no data, so return LAST VALUE */
> @@ -418,11 +416,12 @@ static int tsl2x7x_get_lux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>       lux = lux64;
>       lux = (lux + 500) / 1000;
>  
> -     if (lux > TSL2X7X_LUX_CALC_OVER_FLOW) /* check for overflow */
> +     if (lux > TSL2X7X_LUX_CALC_OVER_FLOW) { /* check for overflow */
> +return_max:
>               lux = TSL2X7X_LUX_CALC_OVER_FLOW;
> +     }
>  
>       /* Update the structure with the latest lux. */
> -return_max:
>       chip->als_cur_info.lux = lux;
>       ret = lux;
>  

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to