On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 19:42:40 +0100 Greg KH <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 02:13:29PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > Allow setting size of ring buffer for host communication via > > module parameter. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com> > > --- > > drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c b/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c > > index 8d5f529a1dc1..24f8689fdb14 100644 > > --- a/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c > > +++ b/drivers/uio/uio_hv_generic.c > > @@ -39,6 +39,13 @@ > > #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin at microsoft.com>" > > #define DRIVER_DESC "Generic UIO driver for VMBus devices" > > > > +#define RING_SIZE_MIN 64 > > +#define RING_SIZE_MAX 512 > > + > > +static unsigned int ring_size = 128; > > +module_param(ring_size, uint, 0444); > > +MODULE_PARM_DESC(ring_size, "Ring buffer size (# of pages)"); > > Ugh, really? Module parameters suck rocks. No other way to do this > dynamically? This affects all devices for the driver, is that ok? > > And how does anyone know to change this or not? Why would it be > changed? Why can't the kernel get this right on its own? You made UIO API so restrictive there is no parameterization available. The size of ring buffer is generally unchanged. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
