Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com> writes: > "Michael Kelley (EOSG)" <michael.h.kel...@microsoft.com> writes: > >> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >>> >>> You added '#include <linux/interrupt.h>' to mshyperv.h which is included in >>> vclock_gettime.c and pulls in other stuff which fails to expand.... >> >> Is the declaration of hyperv_reenlightenment_intr() even needed in >> mshyperv.h? The '#include <linux/interrupt.h>' is there for the __irq_entry >> annotation on that declaration. There's a declaration of the parallel (and >> unannotated) hyperv_vector_handler(), but that looks like a fossil that >> isn't needed either. >> > > True, > > the only need for the declaration in mshyperv.h is to silence "warning: > no previous prototype for ‘hyperv_reenlightenment_intr’"; I'm not sure > if this actually needs fixing.
It seems we can get away with dropping '__visible' and '__irq_entry' qualifiers from 'hyperv_reenlightenment_intr' declaration in mshyperv.h while keeping them in hv_init.c for the implementation. This way we can avoid the nasty 'no previous prototype' warning and not have to add '#include <linux/interrupt.h>' to mshyperv.h breaking vdso. I'm inclined to go ahead with this in v4 if nobody objects. -- Vitaly _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
