On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 02:20:53PM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> When we hot-remove the device, we first receive a PCI_EJECT message and
> then receive a PCI_BUS_RELATIONS message with bus_rel->device_count == 0.
> 
> The first message is offloaded to hv_eject_device_work(), and the second
> is offloaded to pci_devices_present_work(). Both the paths can be running
> list_del(&hpdev->list_entry), causing general protection fault, because
> system_wq can run them concurrently.
> 
> The patch eliminates the race condition.
> 
> Tested-by: Adrian Suhov <v-ads...@microsoft.com>
> Tested-by: Chris Valean <v-chv...@microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikel...@microsoft.com>
> Acked-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiya...@microsoft.com>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org

I need to know either what commit you are fixing (ie Fixes: tag - which
is preferrable) or you tell me which kernel versions we are targeting
for the stable backport.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuzn...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jack Morgenstein <ja...@mellanox.com>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>
> Cc: K. Y. Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> index 2faf38eab785..5e67dff779a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -461,6 +461,8 @@ struct hv_pcibus_device {
>       struct retarget_msi_interrupt retarget_msi_interrupt_params;
>  
>       spinlock_t retarget_msi_interrupt_lock;
> +
> +     struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1770,7 +1772,7 @@ static void hv_pci_devices_present(struct 
> hv_pcibus_device *hbus,
>       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hbus->device_list_lock, flags);
>  
>       get_hvpcibus(hbus);
> -     schedule_work(&dr_wrk->wrk);
> +     queue_work(hbus->wq, &dr_wrk->wrk);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -1848,7 +1850,7 @@ static void hv_pci_eject_device(struct hv_pci_dev 
> *hpdev)
>       get_pcichild(hpdev, hv_pcidev_ref_pnp);
>       INIT_WORK(&hpdev->wrk, hv_eject_device_work);
>       get_hvpcibus(hpdev->hbus);
> -     schedule_work(&hpdev->wrk);
> +     queue_work(hpdev->hbus->wq, &hpdev->wrk);
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -2463,11 +2465,17 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
>       spin_lock_init(&hbus->retarget_msi_interrupt_lock);
>       sema_init(&hbus->enum_sem, 1);
>       init_completion(&hbus->remove_event);
> +     hbus->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("hv_pci_%x", 0,
> +                                        hbus->sysdata.domain);
> +     if (!hbus->wq) {
> +             ret = -ENOMEM;
> +             goto free_bus;
> +     }
>  
>       ret = vmbus_open(hdev->channel, pci_ring_size, pci_ring_size, NULL, 0,
>                        hv_pci_onchannelcallback, hbus);
>       if (ret)
> -             goto free_bus;
> +             goto destroy_wq;
>  
>       hv_set_drvdata(hdev, hbus);
>  
> @@ -2536,6 +2544,8 @@ static int hv_pci_probe(struct hv_device *hdev,
>       hv_free_config_window(hbus);
>  close:
>       vmbus_close(hdev->channel);
> +destroy_wq:
> +     destroy_workqueue(hbus->wq);
>  free_bus:
>       free_page((unsigned long)hbus);
>       return ret;
> @@ -2615,6 +2625,7 @@ static int hv_pci_remove(struct hv_device *hdev)
>       irq_domain_free_fwnode(hbus->sysdata.fwnode);
>       put_hvpcibus(hbus);
>       wait_for_completion(&hbus->remove_event);
> +     destroy_workqueue(hbus->wq);
>       free_page((unsigned long)hbus);
>       return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to