Stefan Wahren <stefan.wah...@i2se.com> writes:

> The TODO list missed some issues before we can move the driver out of staging.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wah...@i2se.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/TODO | 27 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/TODO 
> b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/TODO
> index 84e6733..7144de2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/TODO
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/TODO
> @@ -23,3 +23,30 @@ there's a lot code that got built that's probably 
> unnecessary these
>  days.  Once we have the set of VCHI-using drivers we want in tree, we
>  should be able to do a sweep of the code to see what's left that's
>  unused.
> +
> +3) Make driver more portable
> +
> +Building this driver with arm/multi_v7_defconfig or arm64/defconfig
> +leads to data corruption during vchiq_test. This should be fixed.

Sounds good, but could you document that it's "vchiq_test -f" for
testing this?

With that, these two get my:

Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to