It doesn't make any difference to runtime but I've switched these two
checks to make my static checker happy.

The problem is that "buffer->data_size" is user controlled and if it's
less than "sizeo(*hdr)" then that means "offset" can be more than
"buffer->data_size".  It's just cleaner to check it in the other order.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder.c b/drivers/android/binder.c
index 764b63a5aade..00322b146469 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder.c
@@ -2058,8 +2058,8 @@ static size_t binder_validate_object(struct binder_buffer 
*buffer, u64 offset)
        struct binder_object_header *hdr;
        size_t object_size = 0;
 
-       if (offset > buffer->data_size - sizeof(*hdr) ||
-           buffer->data_size < sizeof(*hdr) ||
+       if (buffer->data_size < sizeof(*hdr) ||
+           offset > buffer->data_size - sizeof(*hdr) ||
            !IS_ALIGNED(offset, sizeof(u32)))
                return 0;
 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to