Hello Todd, Thanks for the patch.
On 21 April 2018 at 08:26, Todd Poynor <toddpoy...@google.com> wrote: > As a result of various previous patches, ion_buffer_create() now > has two sets of identical statements for initializing two fields of > the buffer struct, next to each other. Remove one set. > > Move the initialization of these two fields together with the > statements that initialize the other two fields from the function > parameters, prior to the heap allocate() call, for consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoy...@google.com> Acked-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.sem...@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c > b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c > index e74db7902549..269a431646be 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion.c > @@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ static struct ion_buffer *ion_buffer_create(struct ion_heap > *heap, > > buffer->heap = heap; > buffer->flags = flags; > + buffer->dev = dev; > + buffer->size = len; > > ret = heap->ops->allocate(heap, buffer, len, flags); > > @@ -93,11 +95,7 @@ static struct ion_buffer *ion_buffer_create(struct > ion_heap *heap, > goto err1; > } > > - buffer->dev = dev; > - buffer->size = len; > > - buffer->dev = dev; > - buffer->size = len; > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buffer->attachments); > mutex_init(&buffer->lock); > mutex_lock(&dev->buffer_lock); > -- > 2.17.0.484.g0c8726318c-goog > Best, Sumit. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
