Hi Julia

Thank you for the patch.

On 03/08/17 13:26, Julia Lawall wrote:
> The data protected is video_out2 and the lock that is released is
> &video_out2->dma_queue_lock, so it seems that that lock should be
> taken as well.

I agree - this certainly looks like there was a copy/paste error perhaps and is
locking the wrong video.

> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.law...@lip6.fr>

Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+rene...@ideasonboard.com>




> ---
>  drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_resizer.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_resizer.c 
> b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_resizer.c
> index 857b0e8..4910cb7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_resizer.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/dm365_resizer.c
> @@ -1059,7 +1059,7 @@ static void resizer_ss_isr(struct vpfe_resizer_device 
> *resizer)
>       /* If resizer B is enabled */
>       if (pipe->output_num > 1 && resizer->resizer_b.output ==
>           RESIZER_OUTPUT_MEMORY) {
> -             spin_lock(&video_out->dma_queue_lock);
> +             spin_lock(&video_out2->dma_queue_lock);
>               vpfe_video_process_buffer_complete(video_out2);
>               video_out2->state = VPFE_VIDEO_BUFFER_NOT_QUEUED;
>               vpfe_video_schedule_next_buffer(video_out2);
> 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to