On Thu, 3 May 2018 13:56:55 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> wrote:
> We should be allocating space for hidden_network_info structs. They > are slightly smaller than hidden_network structs. This bug doesn't > cause a runtime issue beyond the very small ammount of extra memory > used. > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Ajay Singh <ajay.kat...@microchip.com> Thanks for submitting the changes by using correct structure size for memory allocation. > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c > b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c index > 3ca0c97b0627..92322d6f061d 100644 --- > a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c +++ > b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wfi_cfgoperations.c @@ -581,8 +581,8 > @@ wilc_wfi_cfg_alloc_fill_ssid(struct cfg80211_scan_request > *request, int i; int slot_id = 0; > > - ntwk->net_info = kcalloc(request->n_ssids, > - sizeof(struct hidden_network), > GFP_KERNEL); > + ntwk->net_info = kcalloc(request->n_ssids, > sizeof(*ntwk->net_info), > + GFP_KERNEL); > if (!ntwk->net_info) > goto out; > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@linuxdriverproject.org > http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
