On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 04:02:55PM +0100, James Simmons wrote: > > > > /* > > > * Allocate new object. This may result in rather complicated > > > * operations, including fld queries, inode loading, etc. > > > */ > > > o = lu_object_alloc(env, dev, f, conf); > > > - if (IS_ERR(o)) > > > + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(o))) > > > return o; > > > > > > > This is an unrelated and totally pointless. likely/unlikely annotations > > hurt readability, and they should only be added if it's something which > > is going to show up in benchmarking. lu_object_alloc() is already too > > slow for the unlikely() to make a difference and anyway IS_ERR() has an > > unlikely built in so it's duplicative... > > Sounds like a good checkpatch case to test for :-)
The likely/unlikely annotations have their place in fast paths so a checkpatch warning would get annoying... regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
