On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 10:29:43AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Greg KH <g...@kroah.com> writes: > > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 01:07:36PM +0300, Omer Efrat wrote: > >> The BIT macro uses unsigned long which some architectures handle as 32 bit > >> and therefore might cause macro's shift to overflow when used on a value > >> equals or larger than 32 (NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DURATION and afterwards). > >> > >> Since 'filled' member in station_info changed to u64, BIT_ULL macro > >> should be used with all NL80211_STA_INFO_* attribute types instead of BIT > >> to prevent future possible bugs when one will use BIT macro for higher > >> attributes by mistake. > >> > >> This commit cleans up all usages of BIT macro with the above field > >> in cfg80211 by changing it to BIT_ULL instead. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Omer Efrat <omer.ef...@tandemg.com> > > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org> > > Via which tree is this supposed to go?
Not mine :) Have fun with it! greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
