On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 10:10:55AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:16:21PM +0100, John Whitmore wrote:
> > -typedef struct tag_cmd_pkt_tx_feedback {
> > +struct cmpk_txfb_t {
> > /* DWORD 0 */
> > u8 element_id; /* Command packet type. */
> > u8 length; /* Command packet length. */
> > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ typedef struct tag_cmd_pkt_tx_feedback {
> > /* DWORD 5 */
> > u16 reserve3;
> > u16 duration;
> > -} cmpk_txfb_t;
> > +};
>
> People use the "_t" to try to denote a "typedef". When converting to
> just a structure, there is no need to keep the _t anymore at all, so
> this should just be "struct cmpk_txfb".
>
> Or just drop the typedef and use the name for the struct they had here
> already, "struct tag_cmd_pkt_tx_feedback", that also would work.
>
> Same for all of the other patches in this series.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Oops again. Sorry, that should have occured to me. I'll fix up the affected
and resend.
thank you
jwhitmore
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
