On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 11:36:56AM +0530, Ajay Singh wrote:
> Cleanup patch to avoid the below checkpatch reported issue.
>
> "usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see
> Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt".
>
> Signed-off-by: Ajay Singh <ajay.kat...@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> index 6bac3f7..655952a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_wlan.c
> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ void chip_wakeup(struct wilc *wilc)
> } while (wilc_get_chipid(wilc, true) == 0);
> } else if ((wilc->io_type & 0x1) == HIF_SDIO) {
> wilc->hif_func->hif_write_reg(wilc, 0xfa, 1);
> - udelay(200);
> + usleep_range(200, 201);
Hah, that's funny.
No, do it right, don't try to game checkpatch here.
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
