On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 09:39:54AM +0000, ajay.kat...@microchip.com wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> On 2/7/2019 1:42 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > This patch was very confusing to review...
>
> Apologies for the confusion.
>
> > From a process perspective, you really should fold patches 1 and 2
> > together. Otherwise we're re-introducing a bug.
>
> Patch 1 and Patch 2 both are required if commit 0e490657c721 ("staging:
> wilc1000: Fix problem with wrong vif index") is applied else Patch 2 is
> enough for complete fix. For the above reason, I have divided the fixes
> into 2 patches.
> Please suggest, if I should go ahead and submit this in a single patch.
> Should I put 2 'Fixes:' tag in that merge commit or only 0e490657c721
> commit is enough.
>
I always just go with the oldest one. Another option is to include
both.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
