On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 03:04:08AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > From: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com> > > drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c:200:3-8: No need to set > .owner here. The core will do it. > > Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically > > Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci > > Fixes: abddd78ef465 ("staging: kpc2000: Fix: 'kpc_dma_del_device' and other > symbols were not declared") > CC: Rishiraj Manwatkar <manwat...@outlook.com> > Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com> > --- > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > master > head: e2d28c40292bdc35553d599e5bbbeaefbab49416 > commit: abddd78ef465b86fc89a3d9750bb76a138bc0859 [5641/8196] staging: > kpc2000: Fix: 'kpc_dma_del_device' and other symbols were not declared > > kpc_dma_driver.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c > @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static struct platform_driver kpc_dma_pl > .remove = kpc_dma_remove, > .driver = { > .name = KP_DRIVER_NAME_DMA_CONTROLLER, > - .owner = THIS_MODULE, > }, > };
Already in my tree, I think you are a bit behind :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@linuxdriverproject.org http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel