On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 03:04:08AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> From: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> 
> drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c:200:3-8: No need to set 
> .owner here. The core will do it.
> 
>  Remove .owner field if calls are used which set it automatically
> 
> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/api/platform_no_drv_owner.cocci
> 
> Fixes: abddd78ef465 ("staging: kpc2000: Fix: 'kpc_dma_del_device' and other 
> symbols were not declared")
> CC: Rishiraj Manwatkar <manwat...@outlook.com>
> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git 
> master
> head:   e2d28c40292bdc35553d599e5bbbeaefbab49416
> commit: abddd78ef465b86fc89a3d9750bb76a138bc0859 [5641/8196] staging: 
> kpc2000: Fix: 'kpc_dma_del_device' and other symbols were not declared
> 
>  kpc_dma_driver.c |    1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- a/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/kpc2000/kpc_dma/kpc_dma_driver.c
> @@ -197,7 +197,6 @@ static struct platform_driver kpc_dma_pl
>       .remove       = kpc_dma_remove,
>       .driver = {
>               .name   = KP_DRIVER_NAME_DMA_CONTROLLER,
> -             .owner  = THIS_MODULE,
>       },
>  };

Already in my tree, I think you are a bit behind :)

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to