Quoting john.hubb...@gmail.com (2019-08-02 05:19:37)
> From: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
>
> For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages
> via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or
> release_pages().
>
> This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d
> ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions").
>
> Note that this effectively changes the code's behavior in
> i915_gem_userptr_put_pages(): it now calls set_page_dirty_lock(),
> instead of set_page_dirty(). This is probably more accurate.
We've already fixed this in drm-tip where the current code uses
set_page_dirty_lock().
This would conflict with our tree. Rodrigo is handling
drm-intel-next for 5.4, so you guys want to coordinate how
to merge.
Regards, Joonas
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
