Hi Christoph,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 05:31:24AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > @@ -224,9 +220,6 @@ static void *erofs_vmap(struct page **pages, unsigned
> > int count)
> > {
> > int i = 0;
> >
> > - if (use_vmap)
> > - return vmap(pages, count, VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
> > -
> > while (1) {
> > void *addr = vm_map_ram(pages, count, -1, PAGE_KERNEL);
>
> I think you can just open code this in the caller.
Yes, the only one user... will fix...
>
> > static void erofs_vunmap(const void *mem, unsigned int count)
> > {
> > - if (!use_vmap)
> > - vm_unmap_ram(mem, count);
> > - else
> > - vunmap(mem);
> > + vm_unmap_ram(mem, count);
> > }
>
> And this wrapper can go away entirely.
Got it. will fix.
>
> And don't forget to report your performance observations to the arm64
> maintainers!
In my observation, vm_map_ram always performs better...
If there are something strange later, I will report to them
immediately... :)
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
