On 9/23/19 1:38 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
On 9/23/19 2:48 PM, Connor Kuehl wrote:
The local variable 'bcmd_down' is always set to true almost immediately
before the do-while's condition is checked. As a result, !bcmd_down
evaluates to false which short circuits the logical AND operator meaning
that the second operand is never reached and is therefore dead code.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")

Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <connor.ku...@canonical.com>
---
  drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c
index 47352f210c0b..a4b317937b23 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/hal/rtl8188e_cmd.c
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ static u8 _is_fw_read_cmd_down(struct adapter *adapt, u8 msgbox_num)   static s32 FillH2CCmd_88E(struct adapter *adapt, u8 ElementID, u32 CmdLen, u8 *pCmdBuffer)
  {
      u8 bcmd_down = false;
-    s32 retry_cnts = 100;
      u8 h2c_box_num;
      u32 msgbox_addr;
      u32 msgbox_ex_addr;
@@ -103,7 +102,7 @@ static s32 FillH2CCmd_88E(struct adapter *adapt, u8 ElementID, u32 CmdLen, u8 *p
          adapt->HalData->LastHMEBoxNum =
              (h2c_box_num+1) % RTL88E_MAX_H2C_BOX_NUMS;
-    } while ((!bcmd_down) && (retry_cnts--));
+    } while (!bcmd_down);
      ret = _SUCCESS;

This patch is correct; however, the do..while loop will always be executed once, thus you could remove the loop and the loop variable bcmd_down.

Ah, yes! That makes sense, good catch.


@greg: If you would prefer a two-step process, then this one is OK.

I'll do whichever is preferred. I'm happy to NACK this and send a v2 with the dead code and loop removed or I can send a separate patch based on this one to remove the loop.

Thank you,

Connor


Larry


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

Reply via email to