On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 05:58:02PM +0100, Oscar Carter wrote:
> Define the EnCFG_BBType_MASK bit as an OR operation between two previous
> defines instead of using the OR between two new BIT macros. Thus, the
> code is more clear.
>
> Fixes: a74081b44291 ("staging: vt6656: Use BIT() macro instead of hex value")
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Carter <oscar.car...@gmx.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h b/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h
> index c532b27de37f..b01d9ee8677e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/mac.h
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@
> #define EnCFG_BBType_a 0x00
> #define EnCFG_BBType_b BIT(0)
> #define EnCFG_BBType_g BIT(1)
> -#define EnCFG_BBType_MASK (BIT(0) | BIT(1))
> +#define EnCFG_BBType_MASK (EnCFG_BBType_b | EnCFG_BBType_g)
This does not "fix" anything, like your "Fixes:" tag implies. It just
cleans up the code some more. Only use Fixes: if it actually fixes a
problem introduced by a previous patch.
Can you remove that line and resend?
thanks.
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
