On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 03:44:00PM +0200, Christian Gromm wrote:
> This patch fixes error handling on function parameters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Gromm <christian.gr...@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c b/drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c
> index e8c5a8c..e5276524 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/most/usb/usb.c
> @@ -229,14 +229,14 @@ static unsigned int get_stream_frame_size(struct
> most_channel_config *cfg)
> */
> static int hdm_poison_channel(struct most_interface *iface, int channel)
> {
> - struct most_dev *mdev = to_mdev(iface);
> + struct most_dev *mdev;
> unsigned long flags;
> spinlock_t *lock; /* temp. lock */
>
> if (unlikely(!iface)) {
> - dev_warn(&mdev->usb_device->dev, "Poison: Bad interface.\n");
> - return -EIO;
> + return -EFAULT;
-EFAULT is ONLY for when you have an error with copying memory to/from
userspace.
This should just be -EINVAL, right?
And how can iface ever be NULL?
And why unlikely() there, can you measure the difference with/without
it? If not, please drop as the compiler/CPU can do it faster than you
ever can.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel
