Hi!
On Aug 11, 2008, at 6:02 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
would it make sense to use protocol buffers/thrift as the regular
client API instead of the current protocol?
One thing at a time :)
I am wondering about using it for storing the serialized form of the
prepared statement. I want to see how clever this first turns out for
schema and replication objects.
You could run the idea down to the point of saying "why not field" as
well, but I suspect there would be memory allocation/performance
issues if you did that.
Cheers,
-Brian
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
