Hi!
On Aug 14, 2008, at 7:31 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
4) Have a 2-phase commit transaction marshaller within the kernel
which
would be a no-op when only on a single server or a pushdown when
only a
single storage engine is used.
This is the same as my option 1 for me, but it would mean leaving the
transaction coordinator to a lead engine, not developing an upper
layer one. It would mean only one very optimized transaction engine
per transaction, but I can live with that.
Cheers,
-Brian
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
