Great to see we have a short term goal to work towards. With Milestone Cirrus, could we have an "owner" for each of 6 feature points, and this serves for the "owner" to regularly give us updates on % completed. It would also help co-ordinate additional resources to know who to talk to for any involvement. You did not mention Innodb plugin integration. I think for any level of testing/performance we need this?
I'm assuming that some of this information is actually blueprints? Is this correct? If not, would that be a good place for them? * Clean up of the code style * Removal of custom libraries for regex, mysys, dbug * Use of Google Proto Buffers in place of current discovery system and .frm files * Overhaul of testing framework * Standardization on stdint * Removal of all compiler warnings Regards Ronald On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 27, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > > There is no timetable at all. We are not driven by any marketing needs. >> > > > Not that one need be driven by marketing needs to have a timetable... > > -- > > Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss<https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-discuss> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss<https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-discuss> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
