Hi!
I don't see how the command can be atomic internal to the server. We
have no transactional DDL in any engine... I can not see how we would
have an "all or nothing" case occur, especially with a system failure.
Cheers,
-Brian
On Dec 12, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Brian Aker wrote:
Hi!
On Dec 12, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Harrison Fisk wrote:
The big advantage with RENAME TABLE is that you can do multiple
tables
at a time in an atomic fashion.
It is an atomic "command" but that is not an atomic action.
Really? That's potentially unsettling.
Cheers,
-Brian
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
--
_______________________________________________________
Brian "Krow" Aker, brian at tangent.org
Seattle, Washington
http://krow.net/ <-- Me
http://tangent.org/ <-- Software
_______________________________________________________
You can't grep a dead tree.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
