This would likely mean the dropping of the IGNORE keyword from Drizzle's SQL syntax.
Standards are for breaking. Or is that rules? Really, it *feels* like Drizzle is becoming more about making an SQL standards compliant DBS than one that is fast, maintainable and good for scale out. I understand wanting to have known expectations. But, I have just seen "we should do x because it is the standard" thrown around a lot lately. Whereas, when Drizzle started, the tone was more to use the standard where the standard made sense and not use it when it did not make sense. Maybe it does make sense in this case, but, I just don't see the discussion happening these days.
Ok, back to my corner. -- Brian Moon Senior Web Engineer ------------------------------ When you care enough to spend the very least. http://dealnews.com/ _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
