Brian Aker wrote:
Hi!
I don't see us removing INSERT IGNORE, there are too many good use
cases. The only thing we need to figure out is what to do about
behavior where we could end up with a NULL in a NOT NULL.
Same with LOAD DATA INFILE... though we should come up with a better
bulk protocol.
I just don't get it. Why would anyone want to do an operation where
they couldn't tell if it failed, why it failed, or what it did? If it
logged the failures, I wouldn't mind. I can also understand why
somebody might want it for a non-transactional engine (though not why
someone would *want* a non-transactional fine) where there was going to
be partial data load whether they liked it or not. But a legitimate
transactional system being asked -- yea directed -- to lose unknown
quantities of data, well, I just don't get it.
But there are lots of things I don't understand, like why we elected W.
So, whatever makes you guys happy, I guess...
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
