Hi Brian, On 3/10/09 12:57 PM PDT, "Brian Aker" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> the list of differences is pretty long. Even if much SQL syntax is >> preserved, there are changes to basic datatypes, client libraries, >> management, replication, and supported storage engines to name a >> few. Moving applications to Drizzle looks like a one-way migration. > > We will be able to replicate out to MySQL. That will be pretty simple > (and the same to Postgres for that matter). What won't be easy is > replication from MySQL to Drizzle.... there is no API in the MySQL > server to work from (wel... besides just using mysqlbinlog). We can replicate out of MySQL into Drizzle using Tungsten Replicator, which is open source and already works cross-database. The main prerequisite is a working JDBC driver. We can help with that as we have some experience in this area. I'm putting MySQL to Drizzle support on our to-do list for a bit later in the year. Cheers, Robert -- Robert Hodges, CTO, Continuent, Inc. Email: [email protected] Mobile: +1-510-501-3728 Skype: hodgesrm _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
