-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Monty Taylor wrote: > Hey all, > > I've written a draft of a blueprint outlining what criteria are used > when adding potential dependencies. > > http://blueprints.launchpad.net/drizzle/+spec/dependency-inclusion > > Which references the real document: > > http://drizzle.org/wiki/Dependency_inclusion
First, nice job on the write up. Well done. Second, I figured I'd bring it up on the lists, since we talked a bit about it on IRC... We are in need of a C++ unit testing framework which meets these requirements. Myself, I am a fan of CxxTest, but as you rightly pointed out in IRC, it doesn't meet the above requirements for a dependency. List, is there an open source C++ unit testing framework that does meet the above requirements and you would recommend? Cheers, Jay p.s. If people think "we don't really need one", I beg to differ. Currently, in the serialize/ directory, we have a number of stand-alone programs which should be converted into unit tests in a test suite run by make check. It would be nice to standardize the way we stress an interface. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkm3y9MACgkQ2upbWsB4UtGxEACfXM3Qbu82DK0eVYEcmVypT4iF 3DcAnimZFmGegDgK4Lb+dRSETQ+fH/CM =PgG1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
