Completely agreed. I've seen interactive_timeout lead to more confusion than benefit most of the time.
Jeremy On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Eric Bergen <[email protected]> wrote: > I think allowing wait_timeout to be set per session is enough. > Interactive_timeout always seemed like a feature with not enough > benefit to justify it's existence. Per user wait timeouts would be > more interesting than a timeout for clients that set > CLIENT_INTERACTIVE and ones that don't. > > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Brian Aker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > The option "sysdate-is-now"... what should this be? It is basically there > > for Oracle compatibility, but it does give you the advantage of a time > > creation that occurs in row. > > > > The option "interactive_timeout". I've found over the years that users > will > > be confused about this and the wait timeout. What should the > functionality > > be? Should we let clients override the system maximums? > > > > Cheers, > > -Brian > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: > > https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss<https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-discuss> > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : > > https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss<https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-discuss> > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > -- > Eric Bergen > [email protected] > http://www.provenscaling.com > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss<https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-discuss> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss<https://launchpad.net/%7Edrizzle-discuss> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
