On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:27 PM, Stewart Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:03:15PM -0700, Eric Day wrote: >> Not sure if I agree here. I think a pre-parser plugin/module would >> be better than sticking this in the client library. > > What about post-parser? i.e. trap the parse error and then try > remapping. This way wouldn't affect the 99.99% of real queries.
Is a post-parser a little ugly, since it generates a bit of noise on the server for no reason? I wouldn't mind a debug verbosity option that traps for parse errors in the log file, and maybe a corresponding status counter. A parse error trapper would likely prevent this. - Morgan _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
