On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Arjen Lentz <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Robert, > >> Another option is to apply the approach only on groups of >> autocommit transactions, but that would rule out a lot of the value. >> > > Actually I think that is really valuable and perhaps an excellent approach > to start with! > Many apps run autocommit for most stuff, and have some transactions. So > there the vast majority of writes can be done in parallel, which would be a > fantastic improvement. I'm going to guess that Jeremy Zawodny will be > cheering on for this one when he reads ;-) and he won't be the only one. And, better yet, in our case, I know that transactions involving table X can run completely independently of those involving table Y. (You can pretend that I said "database X" and "database Y" if it helps make this easier to digest.) Jeremy
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
