On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:17 PM, MARK CALLAGHAN<[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Jay Pipes<[email protected]> wrote: >> cc'ing the list since it may be interesting to others... >> >> Padraig O'Sullivan wrote: >>> >>> Hey Jay, >>> >>> Here's a quick question on something I want to do that you might be >>> able to help me with. For fun and because I think its a really >>> interesting project, I'm writing a memcached applier which simply >>> pushes update and delete events to a memcached server (for now). >>> Basically, it enables someone to keep a pro-active cache easily. > > As someone who has reviewed all of the diffs for the replication > changes made by Justin and Wei in the Google patches (limited fun was > had by all who modified the code and reviewed the changes), my only > response is .... wow. > > If making such a change in drizzle is easy and/or fun then drizzle is > amazing and gives MySQL a chance of remaining relevant for large-scale > datacenter deployments.
In case this is ambiguous: 'gives MySQL a chance of remaining relevant' --> 'gives MySQL a chance via Drizzle of remaining relevant' Comparing MySQL with Oracle, Postgres and any other RDBMS is looking backwards. There are many products in progress meant to out-scale (HBase, Hypertable, ...) or out-avail (Cassandra, Voldemort, CouchDB) the typical MySQL deployment. Enhancing replication will allow MySQL to remain competitive in that market. > > -- > Mark Callaghan > [email protected] > -- Mark Callaghan [email protected] _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
