Hi!
On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Alex Yurchenko wrote:
What I'm getting at is that it'd be a shame if Drizzle ends up having
different code and execution paths for what is essentially the same
operation. Asynchronous or synchronous should be a matter
replication/logger plugin implementation.
It is... the message format is generated by one layer, but the piece
that does the "apply" is in another. There may be a little trickiness
in registering for the commit event (aka might look ugly) but we
should have that refactored to make it all nice an pretty soon. Right
now the concept of "commit" is too tied to "an engine".
Cheers,
-Brian
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
