Eric Day wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 07:19:04PM +1000, Stewart Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:22:45PM -0700, Monty Taylor wrote:
I think we should introduce a new style or policy on the use of using
namespace. Currently, the only policy we have on this is that using
namespace must never be used in headers, and the implementation should
always do using namespace std;
As we put more and more things into the drizzled namespace, we're going
to want to use them. So, I propose that we never use using namespace
deeper than:
using namespace drizzled;
I quite like using drizzled:: explicitly... but then again, I am weird.
So, I'm doing some namespace cleanup around the Protocol and Scheduler
modules, and have been doing:
using namespace drizzled;
plugin::Protocol ...;
Which I think we just agreed is preferred over:
drizzled::plugin::Protocol ...;
I'm seeing drizzled::message::Table (probably from Stewart ;) already
in the source, but would like to be consistent. We should pick one or
the other and normalize, and I'd prefer the shorter name approach with
'using' (sorry Stewart). Thoughts?
using namespace drizzled; // only in .cc files
Full declarations including all namespaces in .h files
Should be added to the style guide.
-jay
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~drizzle-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
